5 Comments
User's avatar
Chris Lewis's avatar

ANYONE in this pathetic state who would like to purchase a firearm and now can't is harmed. Same goes with the stupid magazine ban.

Expand full comment
Richard Collins's avatar

I forwarded the email to a customer of mine who EXACTLY matches what you are looking for. Purchased an AR15 online, and did the transfer paperwork on 4/18/2023, Background check approved on 4/28/2023, and with mandatory 10 business day wait, he couldn't legally pick up until 5/2/2023 under existing SAR laws. But then HB1240 was signed between the application (4/18/2023) and the pick up date. So now his rifle, which he paid for, is sitting in my vault, collecting dust....

Expand full comment
James B's avatar

Guns are full of consumable parts. A simple extractor spring failure will deadline an AR. After HB1240 the rifle is now useless in WA. It’s very much like owning a car that you can never change tires or brake pads on. Get a blowout on a tire? Send it to the junkyard. I understand there is a specific legal strategy SMF is pursuing but ANYONE who owns a rifle in WA subject to HB1240 is egregiously harmed. Anyway, thanks for the hard work. I’ll continue my support

Expand full comment
Heetor's avatar

I can't help with a delayed transfer, but I have an AR pistol I can't bring into compliance with the ATF final rule. Due to the 1240 parts ban I can order a 16" barrel, and due to a damaged hand I can't use my AR without a brace? Becoming a felon or not being able to use the pistol for home defense seems like definable harm to me. Would a declaration like this be useful?

Expand full comment
Jake Larson's avatar

Not sure if this may apply, but what about purchasing parts for guns that may need servicing?

Expand full comment