I’m glad that someone has brought up the “or the state” part of Article 1, Section 24, since one cannot defend the state without “weapons of war.”
Also, I don’t have any type of legal education, but doesn’t the fact that the absence of a magazine effectively turns a repeating arm into a single-shot firearm effectively resolve the question of whether or not magazines are “arms?”
Good stuff.
I’m glad that someone has brought up the “or the state” part of Article 1, Section 24, since one cannot defend the state without “weapons of war.”
Also, I don’t have any type of legal education, but doesn’t the fact that the absence of a magazine effectively turns a repeating arm into a single-shot firearm effectively resolve the question of whether or not magazines are “arms?”